Pore Water Pressure Development in Non-Uniform Cyclic Triaxial Tests
- Type of resource
- Date created
- April 1985
This series includes technical reports prepared by faculty, students and staff who are associated with the John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center at Stanford University. While the primary focus of Blume Center is earthquake engineering, many of the reports in this series encompass broader topics in structural engineering and materials, computational mechanics, geomechanics, structural health monitoring, and engineering life-cycle risk assessment. Each report includes acknowledgments of the specific sponsors for the report and underlying research. In addition to providing research support, the Blume Center provides administrative support for maintaining and disseminating the technical reports. For more information about the Blume Center and its activities, see https://blume.stanford.edu.
A variety of models have been developed over the past few years to predict pore pressure development in saturated cohesionless soils subject to seismic loading. These models are based primarily upon the results of uniform cyclic tests. Little data is available on pore pressure development during non-uniform loading. This report describes the results of ten non-uniform cyclic triaxial tests performed on Monterey #0 sand at a relative density of 54%. The different series of tests are performed. Within each series, the magnitude and number of cycles of loading remains unchanged but the order in which the stress cycles are applied is varied. Results of these tests shows that the magnitude of pore pressure development depends upon the order of the cycles as well as their magnitudes. This finding is contrary to what is predicted using the Seed, Martin and Lysmer pore pressure generation model with a single, unique pore pressure generation curve. Predictions of pore pressure development made using the Seed, Martin, and Lysmer pore pressure generation model do not agree well with the results of the laboratory tests. In this study, the theoretical predictions always underestimated pore pressure development. A modified model using stress-ratio dependent pore pressure generation curves is developed to ameliorate this deficiency. Predictions made using the stress-ratio dependent model are in substantial agreement with the laboratory test results. The primary discrepancy occurs when the applied cyclic stress ratio is less than the threshold value required to induce liquefaction in uniform cyclic tests.
- Use and reproduction
- User agrees that, where applicable, content will not be used to identify or to otherwise infringe the privacy or confidentiality rights of individuals. Content distributed via the Stanford Digital Repository may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor.