• Introduction: Checks and balances in an endless war
• The new normal
• Forces bigger than the president
• Accountability journalism
• Spies under a government microscope
• Warrior-lawyers
• The GTMO bar
• The presidential synopticon
• Afterword: After the next attack.

Conventional wisdom holds that 9/11 sounded the death knell for presidential accountability. In fact, the opposite is true. The novel powers that our post-9/11 commanders in chief assumed-endless detentions, military commissions, state secrets, broad surveillance, and more-are the culmination of a two-century expansion of presidential authority. But these new powers have been met with thousands of barely visible legal and political constraints-enforced by congressional committees, government lawyers, courts, and the media-that have transformed our unprecedentedly powerful presidency into one that is also unprecedentedly accountable. These constraints are the key to understanding why Obama continued the Bush counterterrorism program, and in this light, the events of the last decade should be seen as a victory, not a failure, of American constitutional government. We have actually preserved the framers' original idea of a balanced constitution, despite the vast increase in presidential power made necessary by this age of permanent emergency.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• Introduction: checks and balances in an endless war
• Part one. Continuity: the new normal; forces bigger than the president
• Part two. Distributed checks and balances: accountability journalism; spies under a government microscope; warrior-lawyers; the GTMO bar
• Part three. Assessment: the presidential synopticon
• Afterword: after the next attack.

Conventional wisdom holds that 9/11 sounded the death knell for presidential accountability. In fact, the opposite is true. The novel powers that our post-9/11 commanders in chief assumed-endless detentions, military commissions, state secrets, broad surveillance, and more-are the culmination of a two-century expansion of presidential authority. But these new powers have been met with thousands of barely visible legal and political constraints-enforced by congressional committees, government lawyers, courts, and the media-that have transformed our unprecedentedly powerful presidency into one that is also unprecedentedly accountable. These constraints are the key to understanding why Obama continued the Bush counterterrorism program, and in this light, the events of the last decade should be seen as a victory, not a failure, of American constitutional government. We have actually preserved the framers' original idea of a balanced constitution, despite the vast increase in presidential power made necessary by this age of permanent emergency.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• The new job
• The Commander in Chief ensnared by law
• Fear and OLC
• When lawyers make terrorism policy
• Torture and the dilemmas of presidential lawyering
• The terror presidency.

• Introduction: Yahoo!
• Visions of a post-territorial order
• The god of the Internet
• Why geography matters
• How governments rule the Net
• China
• The filesharing movement
• Virtues and vices of government control
• Consequences of borders
• Global laws
• Conclusion: Globalization meets governmental coercion.

Will cyberanarchy rule the net? And if we do find a way to regulate our cyberlife will national borders dissolve as the Internet becomes the first global state? In this provocative new work, Jack L. Goldsmith and Tim Wu dismiss the fashionable talk of both a 'borderless' net and of a single governing 'code'. Territorial governments can and will, they contend, exercise significant control over all aspects of Internet communications. Examining policy puzzles from e-commerce to privacy, speech and pornography, intellectual property, and cybercrime, Who Controls the Internet demonstrates that individual governments rather than private or global bodies will play that dominant role in regulation. Accessible and controversial, this work is bound to stir comment.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• 1. Introduction: Yahoo!
• pt.
• 1. The Internet revolution:
• 2. Visions of a post-territorial order
• 3. The god of the Internet
• pt.
• 2. Government strikes back:
• 4. Why geography matters
• How governments rule the Net
• China
• The filesharing movement
• pt.
• 3. Vices, virtues, the future:
• 8. Virtues and vices of government control
• 9. Consequences of borders
• 10. Global laws
• 11. Conclusion: Globalization meets governmental coercion.

Will cyberanarchy rule the net? And if we do find a way to regulate our cyberlife will national borders dissolve as the Internet becomes the first global state? In this provocative new work, Jack L. Goldsmith and Tim Wu dismiss the fashionable talk of both a 'borderless' net and of a single governing 'code'. Territorial governments can and will, they contend, exercise significant control over all aspects of Internet communications. Examining policy puzzles from e-commerce to privacy, speech and pornography, intellectual property, and cybercrime, Who Controls the Internet demonstrates that individual governments rather than private or global bodies will play that dominant role in regulation. Accessible and controversial, this work is bound to stir comment.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• Yahoo!
• Visions of a post-territorial order
• The god of the Internet
• Why geography matters
• How governments rule the Net
• China
• The filesharing movement
• Virtues and vices of government control
• Consequences of borders
• Global laws
• Globalization meets governmental coercion.

Will cyberanarchy rule the net? And if we do find a way to regulate our cyberlife will national borders dissolve as the Internet becomes the first global state? In this provocative new work, Jack L. Goldsmith and Tim Wu dismiss the fashionable talk of both a 'borderless' net and of a single governing 'code'. Territorial governments can and will, they contend, exercise significant control over all aspects of Internet communications. Examining policy puzzles from e-commerce to privacy, speech and pornography, intellectual property, and cybercrime, Who Controls the Internet demonstrates that individual governments rather than private or global bodies will play that dominant role in regulation. Accessible and controversial, this work is bound to stir comment.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• Introduction: Yahoo!
• Visions of a post-territorial order
• The god of the Internet
• Why geography matters
• How governments rule the Net
• China
• The filesharing movement
• Virtues and vices of government control
• Consequences of borders
• Global laws
• Conclusion: Globalization meets governmental coercion.

Will cyberanarchy rule the net? And if we do find a way to regulate our cyberlife will national borders dissolve as the Internet becomes the first global state? In this provocative new work, Jack L. Goldsmith and Tim Wu dismiss the fashionable talk of both a 'borderless' net and of a single governing 'code'. Territorial governments can and will, they contend, exercise significant control over all aspects of Internet communications. Examining policy puzzles from e-commerce to privacy, speech and pornography, intellectual property, and cybercrime, Who Controls the Internet demonstrates that individual governments rather than private or global bodies will play that dominant role in regulation. Accessible and controversial, this work is bound to stir comment.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• Introduction: Yahoo!
• Visions of a post-territorial order
• The god of the Internet
• Why geography matters
• How governments rule the Net
• China
• The filesharing movement
• Virtues and vices of government control
• Consequences of borders
• Global laws
• Conclusion: Globalization meets governmental coercion.

Will cyberanarchy rule the net? And if we do find a way to regulate our cyberlife will national borders dissolve as the Internet becomes the first global state? In this provocative new work, Jack L. Goldsmith and Tim Wu dismiss the fashionable talk of both a 'borderless' net and of a single governing 'code'. Territorial governments can and will, they contend, exercise significant control over all aspects of Internet communications. Examining policy puzzles from e-commerce to privacy, speech and pornography, intellectual property, and cybercrime, Who Controls the Internet demonstrates that individual governments rather than private or global bodies will play that dominant role in regulation. Accessible and controversial, this work is bound to stir comment.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• 1. Introduction-- PART I: CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 2. A Theory of Customary International Law--
• 3. Case Studies-- PART II: TREATIES--
• 4. A Theory of International Agreements--
• 5. Human Rights--
• 6. International Trade-- PART III: RHETORIC, MORALITY, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 7. A Theory of International Rhetoric--
• 8. International Law and Moral Obligation--
• 9. Liberal Democracy and Cosmopolitan Duty--
• 10. Conclusion.
• (source: Nielsen Book Data)

"The Limits of International Law" argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, the authors show that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation. States are able to cooperate through International Law but only under narrow conditions; much of International Law merely ratifies existing relationships, and has no independent normative force. Indeed, recent efforts to replace international politics with law and judicial process rests on a misunderstanding of the past accomplishments of International Law. "The Limits of International Law" will have important implications for debates about the role of International Law in the foreign policy of the United States and other nations.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• 1. Introduction-- PART I: CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 2. A Theory of Customary International Law--
• 3. Case Studies-- PART II: TREATIES--
• 4. A Theory of International Agreements--
• 5. Human Rights--
• 6. International Trade-- PART III: RHETORIC, MORALITY, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 7. A Theory of International Rhetoric--
• 8. International Law and Moral Obligation--
• 9. Liberal Democracy and Cosmopolitan Duty--
• 10. Conclusion.
• (source: Nielsen Book Data)

"The Limits of International Law" argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, the authors show that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation. States are able to cooperate through International Law but only under narrow conditions; much of International Law merely ratifies existing relationships, and has no independent normative force. Indeed, recent efforts to replace international politics with law and judicial process rests on a misunderstanding of the past accomplishments of International Law. "The Limits of International Law" will have important implications for debates about the role of International Law in the foreign policy of the United States and other nations.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)
Argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, this book shows that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• 1. Introduction-- PART I: CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 2. A Theory of Customary International Law--
• 3. Case Studies-- PART II: TREATIES--
• 4. A Theory of International Agreements--
• 5. Human Rights--
• 6. International Trade-- PART III: RHETORIC, MORALITY, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 7. A Theory of International Rhetoric--
• 8. International Law and Moral Obligation--
• 9. Liberal Democracy and Cosmopolitan Duty--
• 10. Conclusion.
• (source: Nielsen Book Data)

Argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, this book shows that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)
"The Limits of International Law" argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, the authors show that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation. States are able to cooperate through International Law but only under narrow conditions; much of International Law merely ratifies existing relationships, and has no independent normative force. Indeed, recent efforts to replace international politics with law and judicial process rests on a misunderstanding of the past accomplishments of International Law. "The Limits of International Law" will have important implications for debates about the role of International Law in the foreign policy of the United States and other nations.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• 1. Introduction-- PART I: CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 2. A Theory of Customary International Law--
• 3. Case Studies-- PART II: TREATIES--
• 4. A Theory of International Agreements--
• 5. Human Rights--
• 6. International Trade-- PART III: RHETORIC, MORALITY, AND INTERNATIONAL LAW--
• 7. A Theory of International Rhetoric--
• 8. International Law and Moral Obligation--
• 9. Liberal Democracy and Cosmopolitan Duty--
• 10. Conclusion.
• (source: Nielsen Book Data)

"The Limits of International Law" argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, the authors show that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation. States are able to cooperate through International Law but only under narrow conditions; much of International Law merely ratifies existing relationships, and has no independent normative force. Indeed, recent efforts to replace international politics with law and judicial process rests on a misunderstanding of the past accomplishments of International Law. "The Limits of International Law" will have important implications for debates about the role of International Law in the foreign policy of the United States and other nations.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)
Argues that International Law matters but that its scope and significance is far less than assumed by academics, the media, and many public officials. Adopting a rational choice framework, this book shows that International Law is a term that we use to refer to variously circumscribed cases of international cooperation.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• Introduction: historical and conceptual foundations
• Courts and foreign relations
• Congress and the president in foreign relations
• War powers
• War on terrorism
• States and foreign relations
• Treaties and other international agreements
• Customary international law and international human rights litigation
• Extraterritoriality.

• Introduction : historical and conceptual foundations
• Courts and foreign relations
• Congress and the President in foreign relations
• War powers
• States and foreign relations
• Treaties and other international agreements
• Customary international law and international human rights litigation
• Extraterritoriality.

• Introduction : historical and conceptual foundations
• Courts and foreign relations
• Congress and the president in foreign relations
• War powers
• States and foreign relations
• Treaties and other international agreements
• Customary international law
• Extraterritoriality
• Foreign sovereign immunity.

This title shows how parties can mitigate the effects of concurrent jurisdiction ex ante through the use of forum selection clauses in arbitration agreements, and also explains the role of provisional measures in the regulation of forum selection.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)