Sutherland, Roanne, Meurisse, Nicolas, Pugh, Andrew R., Ranger, Christopher M., Reding, Michael E., Kerr, Jessica L., Russell, Jessica, and Withers, Toni M.
Brockerhoff, Eckehard G., Gresham, Belinda A., Meurisse, Nicolas, Nahrung, Helen F., Perret-Gentil, Anouchka, Pugh, Andrew R., Sopow, Stephanie L., and Turner, Rebbeca M.
Avila, Gonzalo A., MacDonald, Frances H., Hunt, Sophie K., Santos, Karina, Alavi, Maryam, Pugh, Andrew R., Gresham, Belinda A., Pearce, Brittany, Prache, Anne, and Withers, Toni M.
Pugh, Andrew R., Romo, Cecilia M., Clare, Graeme K., Meurisse, Nicolas, Bader, Martin K.-F., and Pawson, Stephen M.
Environmental Entomology. 52(1):56-66
Subjects
Agricultural and Veterinary sciences, Agricultural Science, Forestry and Fisheries, Forest Science, Lantbruksvetenskap och veterinärmedicin, Lantbruksvetenskap, skogsbruk och fiske, Skogsvetenskap, Natural Sciences, Biological Sciences, Ecology, Naturvetenskap, Biologiska vetenskaper, Ekologi, insect development, risk analysis, phytosanitary measure, Forestry and Wood Technology, and Skog och träteknik
Abstract
Hylurgus ligniperda (F.) and Hylastes ater (Paykull) are secondary bark beetles that have successfully spread beyond their native range, particularly into Pinus spp. plantations in the Southern Hemisphere. They feed on the phloem and cambial regions of highly stressed and recently dead Pinus spp. Here H. ligniperda and H. ater egg, larval, and pupal survival and development rates were modeled. Survival was variably influenced by temperatures depending on the life stage, but general trends were for H. ligniperda to tolerate warmer temperatures in comparison to H. ater. Nonlinear models showed 26, 29, and 34 degrees C are the optimal temperature (maximum development rates) for the development of eggs, larvae, and pupae of H. ligniperda. In contrast, optimal temperature predictions were lower for H. ater, with estimates of 26, 22, and 23 degrees C for the development of eggs, larvae, and pupae, respectively. H. ligniperda pre-imaginal stages were more tolerant to high temperatures, and H. ater pre-imaginal stages were more tolerant to low temperatures. Understanding the thermal requirements and limits for development for these two pests can assist in modeling emergence times, their current and potential species distribution and have potential phytosanitary applications.
Pugh, Andrew R, Romo, Cecilia M, Clare, Graeme K, Meurisse, Nicolas, Bader, Martin K F, and Pawson, Stephen M
Environmental Entomology; February 2023, Vol. 52 Issue: 1 p56-66, 11p
Abstract
Hylurgus ligniperda(F.) and Hylastes ater(Paykull) are secondary bark beetles that have successfully spread beyond their native range, particularly into Pinusspp. plantations in the Southern Hemisphere. They feed on the phloem and cambial regions of highly stressed and recently dead Pinusspp. Here H. ligniperdaand H. ateregg, larval, and pupal survival and development rates were modeled. Survival was variably influenced by temperatures depending on the life stage, but general trends were for H. ligniperdato tolerate warmer temperatures in comparison to H. ater. Nonlinear models showed 26, 29, and 34°C are the optimal temperature (maximum development rates) for the development of eggs, larvae, and pupae of H. ligniperda. In contrast, optimal temperature predictions were lower for H. ater, with estimates of 26, 22, and 23°C for the development of eggs, larvae, and pupae, respectively. H. ligniperdapre-imaginal stages were more tolerant to high temperatures, and H. aterpre-imaginal stages were more tolerant to low temperatures. Understanding the thermal requirements and limits for development for these two pests can assist in modeling emergence times, their current and potential species distribution and have potential phytosanitary applications.
Pugh, Andrew R., Dean M. OâConnellauthorBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand, and Stephen D. WrattenauthorBio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand
Subjects
Floral resource, biological control, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, potatoes, trophic relationships, biological control agents, Pest management, Bactericera cockerelli, Hemiptera, buckwheat, Trophic cascade, New association, Triozidae, greenhouses, Trialeurodes vaporariorum, crops, Coccinellidae, Myzus persicae, Natural enemy, longevity, Prey choice, and tubers