Recent technical advances has made machine learning (ML) a promising component to include in end user facing systems. However, user experience (UX) practitioners face challenges in relating ML to existing user-centered design processes and how to navigate the possibilities and constraints of this design space. Drawing on our own experience, we characterize designing within this space as navigating trade-offs between data gathering, model development and designing valuable interactions for a given model performance. We suggest that the theoretical description of how machine learning performance scales with training data can guide designers in these trade-offs as well as having implications for prototyping. We exemplify the learning curve's usage by arguing that a useful pattern is to design an initial system in a bootstrap phase that aims to exploit the training effect of data collected at increasing orders of magnitude. Comment: Accepted for presentation in poster format for the ACM CHI'19 Workshop
Clinical decision support tools (DST) promise improved healthcare outcomes by offering data-driven insights. While effective in lab settings, almost all DSTs have failed in practice. Empirical research diagnosed poor contextual fit as the cause. This paper describes the design and field evaluation of a radically new form of DST. It automatically generates slides for clinicians' decision meetings with subtly embedded machine prognostics. This design took inspiration from the notion of "Unremarkable Computing", that by augmenting the users' routines technology/AI can have significant importance for the users yet remain unobtrusive. Our field evaluation suggests clinicians are more likely to encounter and embrace such a DST. Drawing on their responses, we discuss the importance and intricacies of finding the right level of unremarkableness in DST design, and share lessons learned in prototyping critical AI systems as a situated experience.