Government documents

Stanford is a depository library for California state, federal, UN, and EU government documents, and has extensive holdings of documents from foreign national and local IGOs and NGOs. These include publications, data, statistics, archival records, and more.

The Libraries acquire materials via depository agreements, subscriptions, mailing lists, and by contacting agencies directly. We also subscribe to commercial databases containing government publications, data, and archival records.

Library Law (Crown) Remove constraint Library: Law (Crown) Call number LC Classification|F - United States, British, Dutch, French, Latin America (Local History)|F - United States, British, Dutch, French, Latin America (Local History) Remove constraint Call number: LC Classification|F - United States, British, Dutch, French, Latin America (Local History)|F - United States, British, Dutch, French, Latin America (Local History) Call number LC Classification|F - United States, British, Dutch, French, Latin America (Local History) Remove constraint Call number: LC Classification|F - United States, British, Dutch, French, Latin America (Local History) Era 20th century Remove constraint Era: 20th century Genre Government document Remove constraint Genre: Government document Region Southern States Remove constraint Region: Southern States

%{search_type} search results

1 catalog result

RSS feed for this result

1. The Confederate and neo-Confederate reader : the "great truth" about the "lost cause" [2010]

  • [Jackson, Mississippi] : University Press of Mississippi, [2010]
Description
Book — xiii, 424 pages : illustrations, maps ; 23 cm
Summary
  • Introduction: Unknown well-known documents
  • The gathering storm (1787-1860)
  • Secession (1859-1861)
  • Civil War (1861-1865)
  • Reconstruction and fusion (1866-1890)
  • The nadir of race relations (1890-1940)
  • The civil rights era, 1940-
  • Concluding words.
Most Americans hold basic misconceptions about the Confederacy, the Civil War, and the actions of subsequent neo-Confederates. For example, two thirds of Americans--including most history teachers--think the Confederate States seceded for ""states' rights."" This error persists because most have never read the key documents about the Confederacy.These documents have always been there. When South Carolina seceded, it published ""Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union."" The document actually opposes states' rights. Its authors argue that Northern states were ignoring the rights of slave owners as identified by Congress and in the Constitution. Similarly, Mississippi's ""Declaration of the Immediate Causes ..."" says, ""Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery--the greatest material interest of the world.""Later documents in this collection show how neo-Confederates obfuscated this truth, starting around 1890. The evidence also points to the centrality of race in neo-Confederate thought even today and to the continuing importance of neo-Confederate ideas in American political life. The 150th anniversary of secession and civil war provides a moment for all Americans to read these documents, properly set in context by award-winning sociologist and historian James W. Loewen and co-editor, Edward H. Sebesta, to put in perspective the mythology of the Old South.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)
Online
Law Library (Crown)