%{search_type} search results

Les théories de l'injustice structurelle ont suscité un intérêt grandissant chez les philosophes et les théoriciens politiques. Fortement inspirées par les travaux de la politiste Iris Marion Young, ces théories cherchent à rendre compte des injustices produites par des processus sociaux plutôt que par des actions individuelles. Elles nous invitent à concevoir une responsabilité prospective de faire cesser l'injustice, plutôt qu'une responsabilité rétrospective fondée sur l'identification des torts commis par des agents. Pour réfléchir à ce nouveau régime de responsabilité, les articles de ce numéro approfondissent la réflexion entamée par Iris Marion Young en l'appliquant notamment aux enjeux migratoires, à la crise environnementale et à la lutte contre l'exclusion et les inégalités socio-économiques mondiales. Ils examinent quelques problèmes conceptuels, thématisent le rôle de l'action individuelle dans la production d'injustices structurelles, les mécanismes d'évitement des responsabilités et l'implication des victimes dans la lutte contre ces injustices.

A new model for the relationship between science and democracy that spans policymaking, the funding and conduct of research, and our approach to new technologies Our ability to act on some of the most pressing issues of our time, from pandemics and climate change to artificial intelligence and nuclear weapons, depends on knowledge provided by scientists and other experts. Meanwhile, contemporary political life is increasingly characterized by problematic responses to expertise, with denials of science on the one hand and complaints about the ignorance of the citizenry on the other. Politics and Expertise offers a new model for the relationship between science and democracy, rooted in the ways in which scientific knowledge and the political context of its use are imperfect. Zeynep Pamuk starts from the fact that science is uncertain, incomplete, and contested, and shows how scientists' judgments about what is significant and useful shape the agenda and framing of political decisions. The challenge, Pamuk argues, is to ensure that democracies can expose and contest the assumptions and omissions of scientists, instead of choosing between wholesale acceptance or rejection of expertise. To this end, she argues for institutions that support scientific dissent, proposes an adversarial "science court" to facilitate the public scrutiny of science, reimagines structures for funding scientific research, and provocatively suggests restricting research into dangerous new technologies. Through rigorous philosophical analysis and fascinating examples, Politics and Expertise moves the conversation beyond the dichotomy between technocracy and populism and develops a better answer for how to govern and use science democratically.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

There is a strong medium-to-long-term future for gas so long as it wholeheartedly embraces the energy transition and partners with renewables to produce carbon-free products, notably hydrogen, whilst embracing carbon capture and storage (CCS). Gas has several key advantages. It is highly flexible and can be used for heating, cooling, cooking, waste disposal and transportation as well as feedstock for chemicals, fertilisers and pharmaceutical products. Moreover, throughout most of the UNECE area there are already extensive distribution networks that enable gas to be transferred both across borders and within member states. These network can be adapted to carry hydrogen either mixed in with natural gas or as self-contained systems. They can also be used to distribute CO2.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)

• Beseda Ivana Vyrypaeva i Evgenii͡a Pustoshkina ob "Iranskoĭ konferent͡sii"
• "Iranskai͡a konferent͡sii͡a"
• A discussion between Ivan Vyrypaev and Eugene Pustoshenko on The Iran Conference
• The Iran Conference