Objectifying measures : the dominance of high-stakes testing and the politics of schooling
- Johnson, Amanda Walker.
- Philadelphia, PA : Temple University Press, 2009.
- Physical description
- viii, 212 p. : maps ; 22 cm.
LB3052 .T4 J64 2009
- Unknown LB3052 .T4 J64 2009
- Includes bibliographical references (p. -208) and index.
- Introduction 1-- 2. Context 33-- 3. Statistical Objectification, Governmentality, and Race in High-stakes Testing 62-- 4. Commodification, Privatization, and Political Economy of Statistical Discourse 91-- 5. Statistical Objectification, Truth, and Hegemony 139-- 6. Between Women and the State of Texas: Representation and the Politics of Experience 169-- Conclusion 194.
- (source: Nielsen Book Data)
- Publisher's Summary
- In the past twenty years, the number of educational tests with high-stakes consequences - such as promotion to the next grade level or graduating from high school - has increased. At the same time, the difficulty of the tests has also increased. In Texas, a Latina state legislator introduced and lobbied for a bill that would take such factors as teacher recommendations, portfolios of student work, and grades into account for the students - usually students of colour - who failed such tests. The bill was defeated. Using several types of ethnographic study (personal interviews, observations of the Legislature in action, news broadcasts, public documents from the Legislature and Texas Education Agency), Amanda Walker Johnson observed the struggle for the bill's passage. Through recounting this experience, "Objectifying Measures" explores the relationship between the cultural production of scientific knowledge (of statistics in particular) and the often intuitive resistance to objectification of those adversely affected by the power of policies underwritten as 'scientific'.
(source: Nielsen Book Data)
- Publication date
- Amanda Walker Johnson.